Skip Navigation
THE FEDERATION PRESS
 
 
Password
Online Bookstore Book Supplements Newsletter Subscription For Academics For Bookshops For Authors About Us Journals Holt Prize
     
 

PAGE TITLE

Law in Context

Abstract from Volume 20 No 2 (2002) Therapeutic Jurisprudence

Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Anorexia: A Synergy?

Terry Carney is Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Sydney.
Dominique Saunders is Research Associate, Faculty of Law, University of Sydney.

This article analyses file histories and qualitative data from cases where clinicians and tribunals have made choices about invoking one or more of the various legal avenues by which treatment may be enforced for a person with severe anorexia nervosa. Adopting a thera­peutic jurisprudence (TJ) framework, it is argued that there are therapeutic advantages favouring some forms of interventions over others (such as in choosing between mental health and guardianship laws), and other TJ applications such as in law reform (advance directives) or in the ‘strategic’ use of law. Each individual case must, however, be contextualised and judged by the particular needs of the individual anorexia patient.

(2002) 20 No 2 Law in Context 54

   
        BACK TO TOP